Before you read this blog article you might like to download the South Australian Strategic Plan to have next to you for reference. You can get it at…http://www.saplan.net.au/print-the-plan
The latest of the “razor gang” cuts that occurred to South Australia’s arts community this week has left this writer feeling (along with quite a few other people and organizations) a little battered and sore but certainly not dead, buried and cremated (sorry Tony).
The very real outcomes of the budget is still yet to be felt and realized through the strategies that Arts SA will now endeavor to develop and in turn deliver over the next 12 months or so.
“Small to medium-sized arts companies will bear the brunt of the cuts, with Industry Development funding to be cut by a quarter, or more than $1 million, by 2013-14. This program funds 39 organizations, including Leigh Warren & Dancers, Vitalstatistix and Brink theatre companies, the Australian Experimental Art Foundation and Ausdance.” – from Adelaide Now – September 16 2010
What this writer thought was an interesting thing to do at this stage of uncertainty and flux was to go back to the South Australia’s Strategic Plan (SASP) first developed in 2004 and look at the targets and key measures that pertain to the arts.
As an aside it is EXTREMELY IMPORTANT to note that the SASP is currently being made anew and the state government is calling for the public to have a say – go to http://www.saplan.net.au/ NOW and begin to look for ways to comment and participate.
Not surprisingly, nowhere and we at CWTP mean NOWHERE are the areas that will be suffering the cuts over the next twelve months mentioned as a single entity or sector in the SASP. The closest of the plan’s targets that you could possibly fit most of the companies and individuals about to receive cuts into is…
T4.1 “Creative Industries (new): increase the number of South Australians undertaking work in the creative industries by 20% by 2014”
It is interesting to note that the supplementary measure used in achieving this target is the “Number of South Australian’s employed in the combined areas of television, film and interactive content development and production” and this measure certainly does not relate to the sector / echelon as described above that will receive the cuts.
In the 2008 Progress Report on the SASP the key measure “Number of South Australian’s undertaking work in the creative industries” – this measure may indeed include the small to medium sector as described above – has increased by the following amounts;
- From 68 400 paid in 2004 to 72,800 paid in 2007 – (an increase of 4,400 and we at CWTP would imagine this is greatly if not ALL part time work)
- From 136,600 unpaid in 2004 to 208,700 unpaid in 2007 – (a massive increase of 72,100 volunteers).
Some questions arise at this point…
- Why does it seem that volunteers and unpaid “work” in the creative industries is being used to prop up this measure?
- Does this look like a blurring between the arts and creative professional and the arts and creative hobbyist?
- Whilst the unpaid arts and creative hobbyist is an important sector of our State’s culture, would it be more pertinent to place it into the SASP’s Building Communities under it’s T5.6 target under Volunteering?
The second of the targets T4.2 is “Double the number of feature films produced in South Australia by 2014” which according to the SASP 2008 Progress Report is on track. We at CWTP assume that the budget announcement that funding for the SA Film Corporation’s new Film Lab initiative will be capped at just under $1 million from next year, saving $500,000 a year will not cause too much of dent in the SAFC being able to keep this key measure as acheiveable.
T4.3 & T4.4 (it’s starting to sound like Arnold Schwarzenegger has taken over the SASP – Ed) both apply to the increase of attendances at South Australia’s cultural institutions and the attendance at selected arts activities (ie: festivals). Both targets are where the majority of the funding increases and some small decreases announced this week would be going. Again from Adelaide Now – September 16 2010…
“The Adelaide Festival, which will go annual from 2012, will receive an extra $9.9 million over three years. Other previously announced initiatives include $1.2 million for a festivals commissioning fund to create new shows and $3 million over four years for major exhibitions. The Adelaide Festival Centre Trust will have its grant funding cut by less than 1 per cent, but ends up better off with $3 million extra funding for its Cabaret and OzAsia festivals. The SA Museum, Art Gallery and State Library will each have their funding cut by about 1 per cent over three years from 2011-12. Fees for arts board members, including the State Library, Museum, Art Gallery, Festival Centre and Adelaide Festival introduced in 1996 will be dropped in 2012-13, saving $400,000 a year. These are currently worth $12,000 a year for board members and $18,000 for chairpersons.”
With these “give and takes” it is obvious that the State Government is solely interested in bolstering this part of the arts industry with little blood letting. In the SASP 2008 Progress Report both T4.3 & T4.4 targets are either on track or in T4.4’s case achieved way before the 2014 due date.
If you take a closer look at T4.4’s key measure “Increase the number of attendances at selected arts activities by 40% by 2014” it seems to read it is actually measuring the amount of visitor numbers NOT local attendances.
Now lets stop here and reiterate that we at CWTP are not against festivals at all and in fact we all love a bit of festival action BUT by going through the budget cuts against the strategic plan in this manner is proving the fact this writer stated at the beginning… NOWHERE are the areas that will be suffering the cuts over the next twelve months are mentioned as a single entity or sector in the SASP. In fact it is becoming obvious that the state government doesn’t seem to be interested in or understanding the role of the small to medium and independent arts sector at all.
We won’t go through the rest of the SASP target by target at this stage but suffice to say that most of the rest of Objective 4: Fostering Creativity and Innovation (before you get to the Investment in Science, Research and Innovation part of Objective 4) involves itself with Understanding Aboriginal Culture (T4.5), Commercialization of Research (T4.6), Business Innovation (T4.7) & Broadband Usage (T4.8) all of which, accordingly to the SASP 2008 Progress Report are floundering, and the achievement of what seems to be their quite high targets are either unclear or unlikely. It is also unclear as to whether the arts sector as a whole are contributing to the measures attached to the objectives due to the fact that most of the arts sector is being funded to present works in festivals and keep old buildings from falling down.
The arts sector is certainly not being funded to…
- research NEW ways of working and creating work for NEW audiences in the commercial field.
- work with technology to create new business opportunities.
- be creative in how we promote the understanding of aboriginal culture.
And herein lies this writer’s argument for this column. NOW is the most IMPORTANT time that the arts sector look at ways of developing new work and being creative across sectors and across the SASP.
If the state government is headstrong on supporting festivals and major organizations, the small to medium and independent arts organizations and artists sector (without doubt the most creative and innovative of the lot) need to strongly argue and pitch themselves at how the arts and cultural pursuits can be represented across all of the objectives of the SASP. Lobby the Arts Industry Council and in turn Arts SA and demand that the arts sector develops a language that describes the unseen benefits of arts and cultural activity so that the amazing work that the small to medium sector can be recognized and not suffer cuts in the future.
A lot of the amazing work that is already being done by the entire small to medium arts sector could be seen to contributing to the following targets of the SASP.
- Improve Well being (Objective 2), Preventative Health (T2.3), Work Life Balance (T2.12)
- Building Communities (Objective 5), especially in the Aboriginal Leadership (T5.7) Multiculturalism (T5.8) and Regional Population (T5.9).
- In Expanding Opportunity (Objective 6) there are many places that the arts and culture can be included and measured through Disability (T6.11) and Education (T6.12), Aboriginal Education (T6.18),
This certainly does not necessarily mean everyone in the arts must resort to getting all “touchy feely”, devising new shows or projects that are targeted towards these audiences or community concern nor does it means that everyone must embark on a community based project around disability housing to solve the problem. Actually it couldn’t be more further from the truth.
The arts sector is wise enough NOT to be petulant and understands that it has long and wide reaching effects on everyone’s lives that comes into contact with it. Watching the arts, participating in it whether it be through being an audience member, a maker or a even volunteer carries with it innovative examples of social capital and the concepts of inclusion, community and cultural identity and belonging.
We urge you to get smart and amend the way we measure and talk about our arts and culture to our broader community that is not necessarily just bottom line dollar figures and audience participation. Start by being involved in the next State’s Strategic Planning mechanisms and future state based and national arts forums that are being organised.
The ShoGo website, or, Amateur vs Professional Part 1.5
We at CWTP couldn’t help sharing this little observation with you. Some of you may be familiar with Arts SA’s new website, ShoGo – www.shogo.com.au. For those not familiar with the site, here is its own description from the ‘About Us’ section:
“ShoGo is South Australia’s newest online network for the performing arts. It is for everyone who wants to see great live performances by some of our nationally and internationally acclaimed professional theatre companies.”
As we understand, Arts SA spent a goodly sum on the project of developing this site as a new mechanism to promote and develop audiences for its professional theatre companies. Despite explicitly stating that the site is intended for SA’s *professional* theatre companies – Arts SA has decided to include a number of amateur theatre companies with them, including the Adelaide Theatre Guild, Northern Light Theatre Company and The Therry Dramatic Society. Indeed there is no effort to disguise that these companies are amateur – The Therry Dramatic Society states that it has been “staging amateur musicals and plays since 1943”.
So why is Arts SA including these amateur companies in the platform for the professional ones? Is it to ‘pad’ out the perceived volume of shows being presented in SA? Is it because Arts SA views these amateur companies as the same as the professional ones that it funds? Or is Arts SA perhaps not interested in all this amateur vs professional terminology? I mean who cares, right? It’s just a website, isn’t it? Does it really matter what goes on it?
We at CWTP take the view that is does actually matter, as this is a small example of a larger willingness to erode a sense of a professional performing arts sector in SA. In our view, associating amateur theatre with professional work devalues the skill of the professional artist and sends mixed messages to audiences about what professional theatre artists produce. As we have discussed in Part I, we can accept that amateurism can abound in professional work, and that amateur work can seek to conduct itself with the greatest professionalism.
That said, we believe that Arts SA’s lack of distinction here is worrying – they are supposed to be building a dynamic sector of professional artists in the state, and encourage daring, risky and inventive professional theatre that can be nationally and internationally acclaimed (as the ShoGo site claims). According to Arts SA’s handbook, the following list – which includes amateur theatre – is ineligible for its support:
“Projects without professional arts outcomes, such as amateur productions, the self-publication of literary works, fundraising, competitions, awards and prizes, as well as projects forming part of a course of study, including graduation activities.”
However, Arts SA’s ShoGo is promoting amateur productions without professional outcomes, and it could even be argued that the continued funding of the Bakehouse and Holden Street Theatre is also passively funding the amateur theatre enterprises of those two organisations. If Arts SA does wants to put its taxpayer funded resources behind amateur work, it hasn’t quite got the green light yet – not without rejigging its eligibility criteria, that is. We hope those at Arts SA will be a bit more mindful of its own eligibility in the future – especially when it comes time to cut one quarter of the small to medium sector next year.
UPDATE: 14 Oct: We’ve noticed that ShoGo has just updated its ‘About Us’ blurb, deleting reference to professional companies:
“ShoGo is South Australia’s newest online network for the performing arts. ShoGo is for everyone who wants to see great live performances – it is a one-stop shop for theatre-goers to find out about shows, companies, venues, reviews, news, special offers and sign up to a free newsletter. It includes cabaret, contemporary dance, physical theatre, theatre, puppetry, opera, comedy, musical theatre, spoken word.”
Perhaps on second thought Arts SA has decided that we don’t have “nationally and internationally acclaimed professional theatre companies”? …We’d be interested to hear your thoughts! The amateur companies remain, by the way…